A firm that sells AEO should be able to say when AEO will not help. Most do not, because the category is new and every pitch promises roughly the same thing: more visibility, more pipeline. But there are legal tech companies for which more AI visibility will not move a single deal, and knowing which ones is most of the expertise.
The winner is often picked before anyone searches
In 6sense’s global buyer research, the vendor that won was already on the buyer’s day-one shortlist 95% of the time, and buyers usually had past experience with most of the vendors they considered. 6sense sells software built around this idea, so hold the exact number loosely. The pattern holds across the research: much of the outcome is set by past exposure — a conference conversation, a peer’s recommendation, a tool someone used at their last firm — not by discovery.
Buyers do use AI tools, but mostly in the middle of the process, to compare vendors they already know rather than to find new ones. Being cited during that comparison is worth having. It is not the same as being found.
Committees don’t decide one question at a time
AEO works by answering an individual’s question well. That is the whole mechanism. But legal tech gets bought by committees, and Gartner’s buyer research shows that content aimed at one buyer’s concerns actually hurt a buying group’s ability to agree, while content aimed at the group as a whole helped. Give five stakeholders five excellent private answers and you can end up with five well-researched positions and no decision.
Legal tech feels this more than most categories. An in-house purchase can pull in the general counsel, legal ops, IT, security, and procurement — each with a different question and a different fear. A law firm adds partners, the practice group that will actually use the tool, and often a knowledge management lead. AEO can help each of them understand you. It cannot get them to agree.
More visibility can’t fix a problem that starts after you’ve been found.
Three things AEO won’t touch
-
Security review. When Bloomberg Law asked legal professionals what held back technology adoption, 86% named security or data security. If deals stall in vendor risk review, more visibility just delivers more buyers to the same wall.
-
A hard onboarding reputation. Long learning curves and slow implementations sat near the top of the same list. Buyers talk to each other — in peer groups, at bar events, in the hallway at ILTACON — and AEO does not reach those conversations.
-
A category with no budget. Nearly a quarter of in-house respondents planned no new technology spending at all. Visibility in a category nobody is buying produces traffic, not pipeline.
Not one of the leading barriers on that list was awareness.
A question to answer before you buy
Look at your last ten lost or stalled deals and write down where each one stopped. If most stalled after the buyer already knew about you — in security review, in procurement, in a committee that never aligned — AEO is not your next investment. If most never reached you at all, it might be. The answer takes an afternoon, and it is worth more than any visibility audit you could buy first.
So the honest case for AEO is narrower than the usual pitch. It’s worth doing when your category is actually researched through these tools, your product holds up in a side-by-side comparison, and your pipeline isn’t already breaking somewhere more expensive. Otherwise, fix the other thing first — and come back to AEO once the deals you already have are closing.
If you find this content insightful, consider subscribing to our LinkedIn Newsletter and following our company page for our latest articles!
