US law firms increased technology spending 9.7% in 2025, pouring billions into AI tools, cloud platforms, and modernized infrastructure. The spending narrative dominates legal technology discussions.
The ROI story tells a more nuanced picture—some categories deliver measurable returns within months, while others remain expensive experiments with unclear payoffs. Understanding which technologies actually drive efficiency gains and revenue growth matters more than tracking aggregate spending.
The High-ROI Categories Firms Are Funding
AI-enhanced legal research and drafting tools show the clearest returns, with firms reporting 50% to 90% time savings on first drafts and complex research tasks. Platforms like Westlaw Precision with generative AI, Lexis+ AI, CoCounsel, and Harvey cut hours off research by answering natural-language questions with grounded, cited responses. One CoCounsel analysis reports 63% faster document review and contract drafting, twice as many relevant cases found in the same time, and roughly 10% additional attorney capacity—up to 12 hours per week—without extra headcount.
Document review and contract analysis tools deliver similar efficiency gains. AI-driven e-discovery and due diligence platforms show 50% to 90% time reductions on large-scale review projects, with some firms reporting more than 30% increased case capacity. These tools compress timelines while improving quality through fewer missed clauses or key documents, supporting both revenue growth and risk management. The ROI comes from handling more matters with existing teams rather than just completing current work faster.
Practice management and workflow automation tools show strong returns in high-volume environments. Intake platforms using AI to triage matters, route work, and automate status updates demonstrate fast payback, particularly for firms handling hundreds of similar matters monthly. The efficiency translates to faster lead conversion, fewer dropped matters, and more consistent process execution—often producing measurable revenue lift with minimal additional staff.
The Uncertain ROI Investments
Cloud migration spending dominates budgets across firm sizes but delivers indirect returns difficult to quantify precisely. 67% of firms moved document management to the cloud, 82% adopted Microsoft 365 as primary email, and 61% run cloud-based phone systems. These migrations enable remote work, improve collaboration, and reduce on-premises hardware costs, but the ROI calculation focuses on avoided future costs and improved flexibility rather than direct efficiency gains on current work.
Cybersecurity investment increased significantly, particularly at AmLaw 100 firms, which treat it as a board-level priority, yet measuring returns proves challenging. The payoff comes from breaches prevented and client confidence maintained rather than tasks completed faster or revenue generated. Firms recognize the necessity but struggle to demonstrate concrete ROI beyond risk mitigation.
Knowledge management platform spending grew 10.5% in 2025, faster than overall technology budgets, as firms invest in systems connecting precedents, matter data, and AI tools. AI layers on top of document repositories cut time finding prior work product, often producing order-of-magnitude gains for knowledge-intensive tasks, but adoption requires cultural change and consistent tagging practices that many firms lack. The technology works when implemented well; implementation remains the challenge.
What Separates High-ROI From Low-ROI Technology
Patterns emerge clearly across successful deployments versus disappointing experiments. High-volume, repeatable tasks deliver better returns than bespoke one-off applications. AI applied to standard NDAs, routine contracts, or recurring research questions shows measurable efficiency gains. The same technology applied to unique, complex matters produces less consistent value.
Deep integration into existing workflows beats standalone tools that require context-switching. Lawyers adopt AI embedded in Westlaw, Practical Law, or their document management system far more readily than separate applications demanding new processes. The best-performing tools layer onto systems that attorneys already use rather than creating additional steps.
Clear metrics distinguish successful implementations from vague innovation theater. Firms tracking hours saved per matter, cases handled per attorney, win rates, or conversion rates can demonstrate ROI and optimize deployment. Those pursuing generic "innovation" without measurement rarely achieve meaningful adoption or returns.
Firm-wide AI strategy and training programs yield several-fold better results than ad hoc individual experimentation. When partners mandate AI use on specific matter types, provide training, and track results, adoption reaches 60% to 80% of targeted attorneys. When firms simply license tools and hope for organic adoption, usage rates often remain below 20%.
The ROI Reality for Different Firm Sizes
ROI patterns vary significantly by firm economics and matter types.
-
AmLaw 100 firms handling sophisticated M&A, complex litigation, and regulatory work find the strongest returns in research acceleration, document review compression, and knowledge management. These matters involve sufficient volume and complexity to justify sophisticated tools while generating fees that support the investment.
-
Midsize firms see better returns from practice management automation, intake optimization, and embedded AI in existing platforms than from custom AI development or experimental pilots. The economics favor tools with clear, immediate efficiency gains over longer-term strategic bets. These firms report strong ROI when technology directly supports more matters per attorney or faster client response times.
-
Small firms demonstrate the highest returns from integrated practice management systems bundling billing, client communication, and matter management rather than point solutions requiring separate workflows. ROI comes primarily from revenue leakage prevention—better time capture, faster invoicing, reduced write-offs—rather than efficiency on substantive legal work.
Strategic Implications
The spending increase matters less than the allocation strategy. Firms achieving measurable ROI concentrate investment on:
-
high-volume workflows,
-
embedded tools in existing systems,
-
establishing clear success metrics, and
-
mandating adoption through training and accountability.
Those treating technology as discretionary innovation rather than core operational infrastructure rarely see returns justifying the 9.7% budget growth.
The data suggest a bifurcation emerging: sophisticated firms using technology to compound productivity advantages versus firms spending similar amounts on tools that sit unused or deliver marginal gains. The spending gap may matter less than the implementation gap separating effective from ineffective technology deployment.
If you find this content insightful, consider subscribing to our LinkedIn Newsletter and following our company page for our latest articles!
